Research

Adherence

Existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures for obesity fail to capture key appetite and eating behavior concepts (e.g., duration of fullness, satisfaction after eating, eating between meals) that are relevant to individuals with obesity and likely to change with treatment.

If you are managing obesity, standard questionnaires might miss how you actually feel after eating (satisfaction, fullness duration). This gap means your provider might not fully understand your specific challenges with cravings or portion control. A comprehensive assessment tool (like the EBAQ) can better capture these nuances to tailor your treatment plan.

GoodRefutesHIGH confidence
Existing patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures used in clinical practice or obesity research do not fully capture appetite and eating behavior concepts considered relevant by individuals with obesity (e.g., duration of fullness, satisfaction after eating, eating between meals, feeling hungry less often, having thoughts about food, eating small portions, eating less often).
Chisom Kanu et al. · Advances in Therapy · 2025

Why this rating

Based on a targeted literature review of 23 PRO measures and exit interviews from a phase 2 trial, providing strong qualitative evidence of content gaps.

Source

Development and Content Evaluation of the Eating Behavior and Appetite Questionnaire (EBAQ) for Individuals with Obesity

Chisom Kanu et al. · Advances in Therapy · 2025

cross_sectional · n=24Cited 1×
Read the paper

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →