Adherence
Physical activity questionnaires (PAQs) and accelerometers demonstrate moderate validity for assessing total physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in epidemiologic studies, with PAQs showing particularly strong correlations for vigorous activity.
For researchers and clinicians, using a well-designed physical activity questionnaire (PAQ) is a valid and scalable method for assessing moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in large groups, especially when gold-standard biomarkers like doubly labeled water are too costly. While accelerometers are useful, they may miss certain activities (like swimming or biking) and showed lower validity for vigorous activity compared to PAQs in this study. Combining methods or using validated questionnaires provides a robust estimate of physical activity levels for epidemiological purposes.
Using a combination of comparison methods, we found the PAQ and accelerometry to have moderate validity for assessing physical activity, especially MVPA, in epidemiologic studies.
Why this rating
Large sample size (n=609), use of gold-standard biomarkers (DLW), and rigorous statistical methods (method of triads).
Source
Validity and Relative Validity of Alternative Methods of Assessing Physical Activity in Epidemiologic Studies: Findings From the Men’s Lifestyle Validation Study
Claire H. Pernar et al. · American Journal of Epidemiology · 2022
This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →