Research

Adherence

Real-time cardiac telerehabilitation reduces sedentary time and lowers medication costs compared to center-based cardiac rehabilitation, while center-based rehabilitation results in smaller waist and hip circumferences.

While both programs improve fitness, telerehabilitation helps patients sit less and costs less in medications. However, center-based programs might lead to slightly better reductions in waist and hip size. Choose telerehabilitation if cost and convenience are priorities, or center-based if anthropometric reduction is the primary goal.

StrongQualifiesHIGH confidence
reMOte-cr participants were less sedentary at 24 weeks (aMD=−61.5 (95% ci −117.8 to −5.3) min/day, p=0.03)... cBexcr participants had smaller waist (aMD=1.71 (95% ci 0.09 to 3.34) cm, p=0.04) and hip circumferences (aMD=1.16 (95% ci 0.06 to 2.27) cm, p=0.04) at 12 weeks... medication costs (nZD331/gBP168 vs nZD605/gBP307, p=0.02) were lower for reMOte-cr.
Ralph Maddison et al. · Heart · 2018

Why this rating

RCT with statistically significant findings for secondary outcomes.

Source

Effects and costs of real-time cardiac telerehabilitation: randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

Ralph Maddison et al. · Heart · 2018

rct · n=162Cited 332×
Read the paper

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →