Research
Adherence
Actigraphy provides a valid, cost-effective, and less invasive alternative to polysomnography (PSG) for estimating sleep parameters in population-based epidemiological studies, with agreement rates of 91-93% in adults.
For tracking sleep in real-world settings, use an actigraphy device (wrist-worn accelerometer). It is a validated, non-invasive, and cost-effective method to estimate sleep duration and efficiency, especially when studying large groups or long-term patterns where lab-based PSG is impossible.
GoodSupportsHIGH confidence
In a comprehensive review of the role of actigraphy in studies of sleep and circadian rhythms, Ancoli Israel et al. (2003) reported that, in adult populations, the estimated agreement between PSG and actigraphy ranged from 91 to 93%.
Why this rating
Based on a review of multiple validation studies cited in the text.
Source
Actigraphy-Based Assessment of Sleep Parameters
Desta Fekedulegn et al. · Annals of Work Exposures and Health · 2020
narrative_reviewCited 257×
Read the paper This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →