Research

Adherence

Thought suppression and cognitive load increase the accessibility and salience of forbidden foods, leading to ironic rebound effects on craving and consumption.

Do not rely on thought suppression to manage cravings. Trying to force yourself not to think about a forbidden food often makes it more salient. Instead, use techniques that interfere with the vividness of food imagery, such as staring at dynamic visual noise, to reduce the intensity of the craving.

GoodSupportsHIGH confidence
Intended thought suppression under mental load makes the suppressed thought more accessible... the opportunity to access chocolate immediately afterwards shows an ironic spill-over (or rebound) into performance and chocolate-reward driven behaviour.
Andrew J. Hill · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · 2007

Why this rating

Supported by multiple experimental studies (Johnston et al., Mann & Ward, Soetens & Braet) showing consistent ironic rebound effects.

Source

The psychology of food craving

Andrew J. Hill · Proceedings of The Nutrition Society · 2007

narrative_reviewCited 250×
Read the paper

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →