Research

Adherence

The combination of lowest household income and highest fast-food outlet exposure results in a 'double burden' with greater odds of obesity and frequent processed meat consumption than either factor alone, demonstrating additive interaction.

If you have a low income and live in an area with many fast-food outlets, your risk of obesity is significantly higher than if you only had one of these risk factors. This is because budget constraints and easy access to unhealthy food interact to make healthy eating very difficult. To counter this, focus on strategies that address both cost and access, such as meal planning and seeking out affordable, healthy food options.

GoodQualifiesHIGH confidence
In jointly classified models, lowest income and highest fast-food outlet proportion in combination were associated with greater odds of obesity (OR = 2.43, 95% CI: 2.09, 2.84), with relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI = 0.03).
Thomas Burgoine et al. · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · 2018

Why this rating

Large sample size, rigorous adjustment, but cross-sectional design limits causal inference.

Source

Examining the interaction of fast-food outlet exposure and income on diet and obesity: evidence from 51,361 UK Biobank participants

Thomas Burgoine et al. · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · 2018

cross_sectional · n=51361Cited 168×
Read the paper

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →