Adherence
A 20-minute theory-informed documentary presenting health, environmental, and animal welfare arguments does not significantly reduce actual meat and animal product (MAP) consumption over a 12-day period when social desirability bias is minimized.
Watching a documentary about the benefits of reducing meat consumption is unlikely to change your actual eating habits within two weeks, even if it makes you want to try. The study shows that while people might *say* they will eat less meat (especially if they think the researchers want them to), their actual consumption remains unchanged. To make a real change, information alone is insufficient; you need concrete plans, recipes, and environmental support, not just emotional appeals.
We found that the documentary did not decrease reported MAP consumption when potential social desirability bias was minimized (Studies 1 and 3).
Why this rating
Randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes (n=649, n=300, n=574) and rigorous controls for social desirability bias.
Source
Effectiveness of a Theory-Informed Documentary to Reduce Consumption of Meat and Animal Products: Three Randomized Controlled Experiments
Maya B. Mathur et al. · Nutrients · 2021
DOI 10.3390/nu13124555
More from this paper
Related findings · Adherence
- Regular physical activity (at least 150 minutes/week of moderate-intensity) reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by 20-30% and lowers the risk of type 2 diabetes by 25-35%.Strong
- Increasing physical activity from a sedentary lifestyle to an active one in middle adulthood significantly reduces the risk of coronary events compared to remaining sedentary.Strong
- Resistance exercise is the only intervention capable of consistently restoring muscle function and strength in sarcopenia, partially overcoming age-related anabolic resistance.Strong
This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →