Research

Adherence

Standardized Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics for nutrition and health in the food and beverage sector are currently available but exhibit substantial heterogeneity in quality, domain coverage, and strength, limiting their ability to drive scalable public health impact.

For investors and policymakers, the current landscape of ESG nutrition metrics is fragmented. To drive real health outcomes, stakeholders must prioritize frameworks that use standardized, quantitative definitions of product healthfulness (e.g., using Nutrient Profiling Systems) and ensure equitable distribution of healthy foods. Simply having an ESG policy is insufficient; the metrics must be rigorous, verifiable, and aligned with scientific dietary guidelines.

GoodQualifiesHIGH confidence
This research identifies a range of nutrition-related metrics used in ESG frameworks with respect to food companies, but with substantial heterogeneity in relevant nutrition domains covered and strength of each metric.
Meghan O’Hearn et al. · BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health · 2023

Why this rating

The study is a comprehensive landscape analysis of 529 metrics across 8 major frameworks, providing robust descriptive evidence of the current state.

Source

Landscape analysis of environmental, social and governance (ESG) investing metrics for consumer nutrition and health in the food and beverage sector

Meghan O’Hearn et al. · BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health · 2023

narrative_reviewCited 11×
Read the paper

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →