Research

Energy balance

Meals in the bottom versus top half of glycemic responses ranked by Abbott resulted in 50±10% less glycemic reduction compared to Dexcom.

Meal planning should account for differences in CGM readings to optimize glycemic control.

StrongSupportsmedium confidence
Within-subject meal rankings for incremental glycemic responses were relatively discordant between CGMs such that meals in the bottom versus top half of glycemic responses ranked by Abbott resulted in 50±10% (p=0.0002) less glycemic reduction compared to Dexcom.
Kevin D. Hall et al. · 2019

Why this rating

Based on the statistical analysis of meal rankings.

Source

Different continuous glucose monitors provide different personalized meal recommendations to minimize postprandial glucose in subjects without diabetes

Kevin D. Hall et al. · 2019

DOI 10.31232/osf.io/ksdqn

other · n=16
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →