Research

Energy balance

There was no significant difference in energy intake between values obtained by COCO and 24-hour recall for days when both methods were used (mean 2092, SD 1044 kcal versus mean 2030, SD 687 kcal, P=.70).

COCO Nutritionist may be a viable alternative to traditional dietary recall methods for assessing energy intake.

StrongSupportsmedium confidence
There was no significant difference in energy intake between values obtained by COCO and 24-hour recall for days when both methods were used (mean 2092, SD 1044 kcal versus mean 2030, SD 687 kcal, P=.70).
Salima Taylor et al. · 2021

Why this rating

Based on the comparison of two established dietary assessment methods.

Source

Use of Natural Spoken Language With Automated Mapping of Self-reported Food Intake to Food Composition Data for Low-Burden Real-time Dietary Assessment: Method Comparison Study (Preprint)

Salima Taylor et al. · 2021

DOI 10.2196/preprints.26988

other · n=35
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →