Research
Metabolic adaptation
The method used to calculate AUC can lead to a different interpretation of the effects of training on post-exercise oxygen consumption.
Practitioners should be cautious in interpreting post-exercise oxygen consumption changes based on the AUC method used.
StrongSupportsmedium confidence
These results suggest that the method used to calculate AUC can lead to a different interpretation of the effects of training on post-exercise oxygen consumption.
Why this rating
Based on the comprehensive analysis of different AUC methods.
Source
A Comparison of Three Methods of Analyzing Post-Exercise Oxygen Consumption
D. J. Jacobsen et al. · International Journal of Sports Medicine · 2005
DOI 10.1055/s-2004-815819
other · n=43Cited 18×
Read the paper DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10
More from this paper
- The change in post-exercise oxygen AUC after nine months of training was 5.36 +/- 10.90 L for the total method, while there was no significant change in incremental or positive incremental AUC.Strong
- There was a moderately high correlation (r=0.67, p <0.05) between baseline and 9-months for the total AUC method.Strong
Related findings · Metabolic adaptation
This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →