Research

Mixed

Validation practices in Markov models for obesity interventions are inconsistently reported, with only 43% of models reporting validation, limiting the reliability and comparability of these evaluations.

Be cautious when using economic evaluations of obesity treatments that do not report validation. Only 43% of the models reviewed reported validation, which limits their reliability. Look for studies that use standardized validation guidelines like ISPOR.

GoodRefutesHIGH confidence
Validation practices were inconsistently reported (43% of models), and structural uncertainty (eg, BMI trajectory assumptions) was rarely addressed.
Qiucen Lin et al. · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · 2025

Why this rating

Systematic review findings.

Source

Critical Analysis of Markov Modeling for the Economic Evaluation of Obesity Interventions: A Systematic Review

Qiucen Lin et al. · Risk Management and Healthcare Policy · 2025

DOI 10.2147/rmhp.s528064

systematic_reviewCited 2×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →