Research

Mixed

Using a single Maximum Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC) position to normalize gluteus maximus EMG data is invalid due to significant individual variation; researchers must use multiple MVIC positions to ensure accuracy.

If you are normalizing EMG data for the gluteus maximus, do not rely on a single 'prone' test. Individual anatomy causes some people to generate higher EMG in standing positions. To get accurate normalization, test multiple positions (e.g., prone and standing) and use the highest value obtained for that specific subject as the baseline.

ModerateRefutesMEDIUM confidence
Therefore, it is recommended that investigators employ multiple MVIC positions, when possible, to ensure accuracy.
Bret Contreras et al. · PeerJ · 2015

Why this rating

Small sample size (n=13), non-significant statistical difference between the two tested positions, but clear demonstration of individual variation.

Source

A comparison of two gluteus maximus EMG maximum voluntary isometric contraction positions

Bret Contreras et al. · PeerJ · 2015

DOI 10.7717/peerj.1261

crossover · n=13Cited 33×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →