Energy balance
Using weight-dependent prediction equations (Goldberg or pTEE methods) to exclude implausible energy reporters in epidemiologic studies of diet and BMI introduces selection bias and reverses observed associations compared to using simple absolute caloric cutoffs.
When analyzing diet and weight data, avoid using complex formulas that exclude people based on their weight if your outcome is also weight-based (like BMI). This creates a statistical illusion. Simple cutoffs for extreme calorie reporting (e.g., <500 or >3500 kcal/day) are often sufficient and less prone to bias. For prospective changes in weight, the method of exclusion matters less.
We found similar associations using the 3 methods... These results do not support the general conclusion that use of exclusion criteria based on the alternative methods might confer an advantage over the recommended exclusion method.
Why this rating
Large prospective cohort (Nurses' Health Study, n=52,110), replication of prior findings, and biomarker validation.
Source
Comparison of Methods to Account for Implausible Reporting of Energy Intake in Epidemiologic Studies
Jinnie J. Rhee et al. · American Journal of Epidemiology · 2015
DOI 10.1093/aje/kwu308
Related findings · Energy balance
- Achieving a total body weight loss of 10-15% (or >10-15 kg) through Total Diet Replacement (TDR) induces remission of Type 2 Diabetes in individuals with short-duration disease.Strong
- Bariatric surgery is superior to medical management alone for inducing significant long-term weight loss, remission of type 2 diabetes, and reduction in mortality for patients with BMI ≥ 40 or ≥ 35 with comorbidities.Strong
- Achieving type 2 diabetes remission requires significant weight loss (≥15 kg) via major caloric restriction, independent of macronutrient composition.Strong
This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →