Research

Energy balance

Time-restricted eating (TRE), lower meal frequency, and earlier caloric distribution result in statistically significant but small weight loss compared to control groups when implemented for 12 weeks or longer.

If you want to try meal timing for weight loss, expect a modest result (around 1-2 kg loss over 12+ weeks) rather than a dramatic transformation. The key is likely that restricting your eating window naturally reduces the amount of food you consume, not a magical metabolic shift. Focus on consistency for at least 12 weeks, and do not expect it to replace the fundamental need for a caloric deficit.

LimitedQualifiesLOW confidence
Statistically significant weight change was observed in TRE when compared with control (–1.37 kg; 95% CI, –1.99 to –0.75 kg). Lower meal frequency and earlier caloric distribution were also both associated with greater change (–1.85 kg; 95% CI, –3.55 to –0.13 kg; and –1.75 kg; 95% CI, –2.37 to –1.13 kg, respectively).
H Y Liu et al. · JAMA Network Open · 2024

Why this rating

Low-certainty evidence due to high risk of bias (76% of trials) and substantial heterogeneity (I2=73%).

Source

Meal Timing and Anthropometric and Metabolic Outcomes

H Y Liu et al. · JAMA Network Open · 2024

DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42163

Meta-analysis · 29 studiesCited 21×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →