Research

Mixed

A machine-readable Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) provides nutrient intake estimates with validity comparable to a 7-day diet diary (7DD) when validated against biomarkers, making it a suitable tool for ranking individuals in large-scale epidemiological studies despite systematic biases in absolute intake estimation.

For large-scale health tracking where absolute precision is less critical than identifying trends and relative intake, a standardized Food Frequency Questionnaire is a valid and efficient tool. It correlates well with biological markers (like fatty acids and vitamins) similarly to more burdensome 7-day diaries, making it suitable for population-level insights without requiring daily logging.

GoodSupportsHIGH confidence
Against the available biomarkers, the machine-readable FFQ performed well in comparison with the manually coded 7DD in this study population.
Eric J. Brunner et al. · British Journal Of Nutrition · 2001

Why this rating

Cross-sectional study with objective biomarker validation (CEFA, plasma vitamins) in a large, stratified sample (n=860), though self-report bias remains a limitation.

Source

Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 d diet diary and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers

Eric J. Brunner et al. · British Journal Of Nutrition · 2001

DOI 10.1079/bjn2001414

cross_sectional · n=860Cited 313×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →