Research

Mixed

Earmarking (hypothecating) health tax revenues for specific health objectives increases public support for the tax and political sustainability, whereas using revenues for general fiscal purposes leaves the tax vulnerable to lobbying and repeal.

To ensure health taxes survive political pressure, governments must earmark the revenue for specific health-related spending, such as subsidizing healthy foods or targeting child obesity. This builds public support and protects the tax from industry lobbying that often leads to repeal when revenues go into the general fund.

GoodSupportsHIGH confidence
earmarking health taxes for health spending tends to increase public support so long as policymakers follow through on specified spending commitments.
Alexandra Wright et al. · BMC Public Health · 2017

Why this rating

Based on systematic review of public opinion studies and case examples (e.g., French Polynesia, Mexico).

Source

Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies

Alexandra Wright et al. · BMC Public Health · 2017

DOI 10.1186/s12889-017-4497-z

systematic_reviewCited 311×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →