Research

Adherence

A comprehensive incentive/disincentive program (SNAP-plus) that subsidizes multiple healthy food groups (F&V, nuts, whole grains, fish, plant-based oils) and disincentivizes unhealthy groups (SSBs, junk food, processed meats) yields the largest health gains and net cost savings among the tested interventions.

Support the 'SNAP-plus' model, which uses a broad basket of incentives for healthy foods and disincentives for unhealthy ones. This approach is modeled to save the most money and prevent the most heart disease, making it the most attractive option for policy makers.

ModerateSupportsMEDIUM confidence
For SNAP-plus, corresponding gains were approximately 940,000 CVD events prevented, 2.47 million QALYs gained, and $41.93 billion saved.
Dariush Mozaffarian et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2018

Why this rating

Based on microsimulation modeling.

Source

Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives and disincentives for improving food purchases and health through the US Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP): A microsimulation study

Dariush Mozaffarian et al. · PLoS Medicine · 2018

DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002661

unknown · n=14500000Cited 142×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →