Research

Mixed

The lack of a unified definition for resistance exercise (RE) in scientific literature leads to heterogeneous inclusion criteria in systematic reviews, which obscures the true magnitude of effects and impairs the development of evidence-based guidelines.

When evaluating resistance training advice or research, check if the definition of 'resistance' is explicit. If a study or program mixes bodyweight exercises, plyometrics, and weighted lifting without distinguishing them, the results may be less precise. For optimal strength or hypertrophy, ensure the training modality matches your specific goal (e.g., traditional strength vs. plyometrics) rather than assuming all 'resistance' is equal.

GoodQualifiesHIGH confidence
Without a clear definition, systematic reviews (with meta-analysis) discuss outcomes of studies examining the effects of RE in different settings, using heterogenous inclusion criteria... This may affect the direction and magnitude of effects, whereby it will be unclear if heterogeneous findings result from natural variation in response to RE or from different definitions of what constitutes RE.
Lars Hubertus Lohmann et al. · European Journal of Applied Physiology · 2026

Why this rating

The paper is a narrative review by multiple experts analyzing existing definitions and meta-analyses.

Source

What is resistance exercise? A review of current uses and potential ways forward

Lars Hubertus Lohmann et al. · European Journal of Applied Physiology · 2026

DOI 10.1007/s00421-026-06148-2

narrative_reviewCited 2×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →