Research

Mixed

Food industry sponsorship of academic research systematically biases the research agenda toward physical activity and nutrient-specific interventions, thereby diverting attention from the health impacts of highly processed foods and ultra-processed diets.

When evaluating health advice or research, always check the funding source. If a study on obesity or nutrition is funded by a food or beverage company, be skeptical of conclusions that emphasize exercise or specific nutrients while ignoring the role of highly processed foods. Prioritize research that is independent of industry funding or focuses on whole dietary patterns rather than isolated components.

GoodSupportsHIGH confidence
Publications resulting from Coca-Cola- and Mars-sponsored research appear to skew the evidence towards solutions that favour industry interests by focusing on food components that can be manipulated and marketed by food companies. These food industry-funded publications can also distract from nutrition as a health issue by diverting public and policy attention to physical activity.
Alice Fabbri et al. · Public Health Nutrition · 2018

Why this rating

Cross-sectional analysis of 204 publications from two major companies; strong observational evidence of bias patterns, though causality of intent is inferred.

Source

Food industry sponsorship of academic research: investigating commercial bias in the research agenda

Alice Fabbri et al. · Public Health Nutrition · 2018

DOI 10.1017/s1368980018002100

cross_sectional · n=204Cited 61×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →