Research

Energy balance

ChamberTEE was approximately 20% lower than dietTEE and isotopeTEE.

Practitioners should consider that different methods of measuring energy expenditure yield significantly different results.

StrongSupportsmedium confidence
ChamberTEE (mean +/- SE = 2,107 +/- 64 kcal/day) was approximately 20% lower than either dietTEE (2,536 +/- 94 kcal/day, P < 0.0001) or isotopeTEE (2,564 +/- 83 kcal/day, P < 0.0001).
Michael Rosenbaum et al. · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 1996

Why this rating

Based on study design from abstract.

Source

A comparative study of different means of assessing long-term energy expenditure in humans

Michael Rosenbaum et al. · American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 1996

DOI 10.1152/ajpregu.1996.270.3.r496

other · n=23Cited 76×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →