Research

Energy balance

In the intervention group, there was statistically significantly higher Part B spending compared to the control group (difference, $513; P = .02).

Practitioners should be aware that while overall spending did not decrease, specific areas like Part B spending increased.

StrongSupportsmedium confidence
In the intervention group, compared with the control group, there was statistically significantly higher Part B spending (difference, $513 [95% CI, $70 to $955]; P = .02).
Peter J. Huckfeldt et al. · JAMA Network Open · 2020

Why this rating

Based on data from a randomized clinical trial.

Source

Associations of Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes With Health Care Use, Spending, and Disability

Peter J. Huckfeldt et al. · JAMA Network Open · 2020

DOI 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25488

rct · n=5145Cited 13×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →