Research

Energy balance

Routine exclusion of evidence other than randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses from consideration in treatment may not always be wise.

Practitioners should consider a broader range of evidence when making treatment decisions.

StrongQualifiesmedium confidence
Routine exclusion of evidence other than randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or meta-analyses from consideration in treatment may not always be wise.
Richard Kones et al. · Current Medical Research and Opinion · 2014

Why this rating

The claim is based on a conceptual review of existing literature.

Source

Exclusion of ‘nonRCT evidence’ in guidelines for chronic diseases – is it always appropriate? The Look AHEAD study

Richard Kones et al. · Current Medical Research and Opinion · 2014

DOI 10.1185/03007995.2014.925438

reviewCited 13×
Read the paper
DOI resolved against Crossref · corpus check 2026-06-10

This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →