Research
Mixed
High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) or Sprint Interval Training (SIT) is more effective than moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) for inducing specific metabolic adaptations (such as PGC1-α, NRF1, TFAM) in individuals who do not respond to moderate-intensity training.
If moderate exercise (like jogging at a conversational pace) hasn't improved your fitness, try adding high-intensity intervals. This type of training triggers different metabolic pathways (like mitochondrial biogenesis) that moderate exercise might miss, especially if you are genetically predisposed to be a 'low responder' to steady-state cardio.
GoodSupportsHIGH confidence
These results further suggest that HIIT training could possibly be more effective to train the LRT [Low Response Trainers] group, since HIIT more readily induced PGC1-α, NRF1, TFAM than aerobic exercise.
Why this rating
Supported by animal models (rats) and cited human studies, though direct large-scale human trials on 'rescuing' non-responders are less common.
Source
Issues on Trainability
Zsolt Radák et al. · Frontiers in Physiology · 2022
narrative_reviewCited 8×
Read the paper This is one finding among thousands. Every one is graded and traced to its source, so you can see what the evidence actually supports. Browse the research →